Argencourt v. United States

LYNCH, Circuit Judge.

In his second trip to this court, Joseph Argencourt argues that he was denied effective assistance of counsel during his criminal trial and that the district court erred in denying his Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Argencourt was convicted of conspiring with his co-defendant Rodney Andreoni to distribute cocaine. His conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. United States v. Argencourt, 996 F.2d 1300 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 731, 126 L.Ed.2d 694 (1994). We now affirm the denial of his motion under 28…