Legal Opinion
Cellular Telephone Co. v. Rosenberg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 28, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Dobbs Ferry dated April 10, 1989, which denied the petitioner’s application for a use variance, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Silverman, J.), dated January 29, 1992, which vacated the determination and directed that the use variance be issued to the petitioner.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The court properly determined that the petitioner, Cellular Telephone Company (hereinafter CTC),…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of Otto v. SteinhilberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Matter of Long Is. Lighting v. Griffin, Fyfe's ShipyardNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Long Island Lighting Co. v. City of Long BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Payne v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cellular Telephone Co. v. RosenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1993