Legal Opinion

Mitchel v. City of Richmond

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 13, 1907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Law and Equity Court of the city of Richmond, in an action of trespass on the case. ~Tudgment for the defendant. Plaintiff assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtCardwell, J.

This action was brought by Mrs. Elizabeth B. Mitchel, to recover damages from the city of Richmond, for injuries suffered by her while walking along one' of the streets of the city.

It appears that the plaintiff and a companion, Mrs. Wing-field, started after night, April 28, 1904, to attend a church entertainment, several squares away from their home; that they walked down Grove Avenue until they came to Sycamore Street (one street above where the accident occurred), where they encountered a wet and muddy sidewalk, on which it was, as they considered, unfit for them to walk (Mrs. Wingfield,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Winchester v. CarrollSupreme Court of Virginia · 1901
  2. Clark v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
  3. City of Richmond v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
  4. Canavan v. City of Oil CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  5. City of Davenport v. Mississippi & Missouri RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Butler v. City of McMinnvilleOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  2. City of Duncan v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API