Legal Opinion
Eudave-Mendez v. Keisler
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 1, 2007No. 05-70597Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ***
Andrea Eudave-Mendez appeals from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ affir-mance of an Immigration Judge’s decision finding her both removable and ineligible for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we grant the petition.
First, we reject Eudave-Mendez’s claim that the subsequent expungement of her California conviction, for violating Cal. Health & Safety Code § 11366.5(a), prevents the Government from removing her on the basis of it. It is true that Lujan-Armendariz v. INS, 222 F.3d 728 (9th Cir.2000) and Garberding v. INS, 30 F.3d 1187 (9th…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hector Tito Lujan-Armendariz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Mauro Roldan-Santoyo v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Byron Paredes-Urrestarazu v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Roberta Charmaine Garberding v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Christopher John Dillingham v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Chong Shin Chen v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.