Legal Opinion

State v. McKimson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 7, 1925No. 26,210PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

Earl.McKimson was convicted of grand larceny and has appealed.

The property taken from one Chenoweth, the owner, consisted of two auto tires, two inner tubes, two tire rims, a pair of mud chains, and an oil can containing two and one-half gallons of automobile oil, all of the value of $78.50. At the trial it was admitted that the property mentioned was stolen from Chenoweth on July 20, 1922, and was of the value stated, but defendant contended that he was not a party to the theft. It was further admitted that on the day of the larceny…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WintersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  2. Brick v. National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. State v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  4. State v. WoodsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  5. State v. WalkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sawtelle v. Cosden Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  2. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  3. State v. RaffertySupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. State v. WelchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  5. State v. EythSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API