Legal Opinion

Marrero v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 11, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marrero was indicted for murder in the first degree and related offenses. Following several continuances that Marrero claims were attributable to the Commonwealth, he moved to dismiss the charges, arguing that his right to a speedy trial had been violated. A judge in the Superior Court denied the motion. Marrero unsuccessfully moved for reconsideration. Thereafter, he unsuccessfully petitioned for relief in the county court pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3.

The case is now before us pursuant to S.J.C. Rule 2:21, as amended, 434 Mass. 1301 (2001). Marrero claims that he has no adequate remedy in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SpauldingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  2. Esteves v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  3. Cousin v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  4. Aldrich v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Flood v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  2. Glawson v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API