Legal Opinion
Rossi v. Borough of Haddonfield
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided December 3, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment is.affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Shebell’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 297 N.J.Super. 494, 688 A.2d 643 (1997).
For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN and COLEMAN — 7.
Opposed — None.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rossi v. Borough of HaddonfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gerber v. Springfield Bd. of Educ.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Lathers v. Township of West WindsorNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- O'Connell v. Nj Sports & Expo. Auth.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Sykes v. RutgersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- MILDRED MOLINO VS. TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH ORANGE (L-7182-14, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018