Legal Opinion

Demille v. Jenkins

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 7, 2020No. 5:20-cv-04559Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIE ANN DEMILLE, Case No. 20-04559 EJD (PR) 11 Petitioner, 12 ORDER OF DISMISSAL; DENYING v. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF 13 COUNSEL AS MOOT 14 W. Z. JENKINS, II, 15 Respondent. (Docket No. 2) 16 17 18 Petitioner, a federal prisoner at the Federal Correctional Institution (“FCI”) in 19 Dublin, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 20 Dkt. No. 1. Petitioner paid the filing fee.

Id.

Petitioner later filed a motion for 21 appointment of counsel. Dkt. No. 2. For the reasons…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. John Badea v. Harvey CoxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Herbert M. Crawford v. Griffin Bell, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. Porco v. HuertaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API