Legal Opinion

Parker v. Rawle

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 1892No. Appeals, Nos. 129, 130PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeals, Nos. 129, 130, July T., 1891, by C. M. Parker and Thomas H. Devine, petitioners, from decrees of C. P. Lackawanna Co., Jan. T., 1890, Nos. 498, 499, against William Brooke Rawle, et al., trustees.

Read the full summary

Appeals, Nos. 129, 130, July T., 1891, by C. M. Parker and Thomas H. Devine, petitioners, from decrees of C. P. Lackawanna Co., Jan. T., 1890, Nos. 498, 499, against William Brooke Rawle, et al., trustees. Distribution of funds paid into court by mortgagors under act of April 3, 1851. The facts, as they appeared in the court below, were as follows : Appellants in these two eases paid into court, under the provisions of the act of April 3, 1851, section 14, P. L. 871, an amount equal to the mortgage debt, with interest and costs in each case. There was a question as to liability for paving…

1Opinion of the Court

Per. Curiam,

The decree is affirmed and the appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Devine, Appellant, v. Rawle.

Per Curiam,

March 28, 1892:

The decree is affirmed and the appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gibson's Petition, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API