Legal Opinion
Lasagna v. McCarthy
Utah Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1947No. 6979PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LATIMER, Justice.
Plaintiff, respondent in this appeal, brought suit against the defendants alleging that as a result of their negligence he suffered personal injuries. Recovery was sought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U. S. C. A. § 51 et seq., and not otherwise. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and defendants brought the case to this court for review. For convenience, the defendants will be referred to in this opinion as “The Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Company,” the “D. & R. G.,” or as “Appellants;” and the plaintiff as “the respondent.”
The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ellis v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Kreigh v. Westinghouse, Church, Kerr & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- McGivern v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Alcorn v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Schaub v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Clinard v. Southern Pacific CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- Hatfield v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Siciliano v. Denver and Rio Grande Western R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1961
- Ottley v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Creamer v. Ogden Union Railway & Depot Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.