Legal Opinion

Keifer v. Cleveland Railway Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 1917PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error: Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga county.

1Opinion of the CourtLiegi-iley, J.

The parties stood in the same order below.

It is a matter of common knowledge that the Public Square in Cleveland, Ohio, is divided into four sections by intersecting streets; that cars of the defendant serving the west and southwest parts of the city loop around the northwest section of the Public Square; that on the westerly side of the northwest section of the square there are two *273southbound tracks with a devil strip between them of approximately ten feet in width;'that passengers or prospective passengers take position on this devil strip waiting to board cars that use the easterly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pullman Palace Car Co. v. LaackIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Schell v. DuBoisOhio Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Phillips v. . New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Gray v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Geary v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. v. Ana SheridanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  2. Young v. ClarkOhio Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Gordon v. WeberOhio Court of Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API