Mauney v. . Coit
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil ActioN tried at Fall Term, 1878, of Rowan Superior Court, before Graves, J. The facts necessary to an understanding of the case are embodied in the opinion of this court. Verdict for plaintiffs, judgment, appeal by defendant. See Bradford v. Coit, 77 N. C., 72.
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, 0. J.
The record sets out numerous exceptions taken by the appellants during the trial before the jury, to the adverse rulings of the court in the admission and rejection of evidence which need not be considered in disposing of the appeal. 1
The defendent is sued as a dormant and newly discovered partner of Amos Howes, with whom the debt alleged to be due to the plaintiffs’ was contracted, and the verdict finds such partnership to have existed. The business conducted by Howes alone and knhis own name terminated on the 1st day of June,.1874, and the Gold Hill mining property under a sale…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jones v. SavageNew York Supreme Court · 1831
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chemical Co. v. McNair.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Mauney v. . CoitSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- Nuzum v. SheppardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
- Hawley, Dodd & Co. v. Jette & ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1881
- Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. KnoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.