Legal Opinion · Dissent

Parker v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 30, 2006No. 06-606Published

1DissentJim Hannah, Chief Justice

I agree with the majority’s statement that the decisive question in this case is whether Robert intended to abandon his homestead rights in the property. However, because I believe the majority errs in its conclusion regarding Robert’s intent, I must respectfully dissent.

In this case, the trial court made the following findings:

The issue is whether Robert Johnson had a homestead interest in the property.... Robert Johnson had long possessed the property as a homestead. He was forced to move out by the dynamics of the divorce but considered the move temporary in nature. He signed an apartment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sims v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. Obenshain v. ObenshainSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Drennen v. WheatleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API