Amoskeag Industries, Inc. v. Board of Mayor of Manchester
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBurque, J.
There is ample evidence to support the Court’s findings. Manchester is an industrial city. It depends mostly upon the industries located therein for its existence. As stated in the findings plaintiff acquired the area involved in 1936. Prior thereto it had been the property of the Amoskeag Manufacturing Company, which had gone into bankruptcy. It was salvaged through the efforts of a group of substantial public-spirited citizens who raised the necessary amount ($550,000) to finance the purchase of the property, through the assistance of the Public Service Company of New Hampshire who…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sherburne v. PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1904
- Dow v. LathamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
- Summerfield v. WetherellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
- Heilman v. WhalleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cersosimo v. Town of TownshendSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- Green Crow Corp. v. Town of New IpswichSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- Jackson v. RaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Locke Development Corp. v. Town of BarnsteadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Rockhouse Mountain Property Owners Ass'n v. Town of ConwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990