Legal Opinion

Hayes v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 3, 1996No. 46A04-9602-CR-71PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Defendant-Appellant Patrick Hayes (Hayes) brings this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order denying his motion to suppress statements and to quash his arrest.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Hayes raises four issues which we consolidate and restate as follows:

1. Whether the trial court erred in denying Hayes’s motion to suppress because the therapist-client privilege was not abrogated.

2. Whether the trial court erred in denying Hayes’s motion to suppress because a therapist must advise his or her client of the existence of the Reporting Statute pri- or to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Buchanan v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Davidson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Garner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Graham v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. J.B. v. E.B.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Cory M. Wallace v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API