Legal Opinion

Stills v. Stills

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 18, 2010No. 08-1352PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JIM GUNTER, Justice.

liAppellant, David Stills, appeals the circuit court’s order denying his petition for change of custody, finding the parties’ earlier relocation agreement unenforceable, and granting appellee’s petition to relocate. On appeal, David argues that the circuit court erred in (1) refusing to enforce the parties’ settlement agreement, specifically the waiver of the Hollands-worth presumption; (2) failing to require Amber to meet her burden of proof under the settlement agreement; (3) failing to find that Amber was equitably estopped from challenging the settlement agreement; (4)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Madden v. AldrichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Hollandsworth v. KnyzewskiSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Hamilton v. BarrettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Stehle v. ZimmerebnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  5. Felton v. Rebsamen Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Singletary v. SingletarySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  2. Bethany v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  3. Daniel v. SpiveySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  4. Gruma Corp. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  5. In the Matter of the Guardianship of S.H.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API