Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1859PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Bell. Tried below before the Hon. N. W. Battle.

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

This indictment accuses Gallaher of the theft of a gelding, and Smith of being accessary to it. It was quashed on motion, as to Smith. The grounds relied on are—1st. That it fails to state an offence at all, because it does not negative the exceptions contained in the Code, indicating who cannot be accessaries ; and, 2d. It is bad for duplicity.

“ An accessary is one who, knowing that an offence has been, committed, conceals the offender, or gives him any other aid, in order that he may evade arrest, or trial, or the execution of his *286sentence. But no person who aids an offender in making or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Colson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1845

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Crow v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Nicholas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1887
  3. Goodwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Cabness v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Hickman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API