Legal Opinion
Friedberg v. Comm'r
United States Tax Court
Decided October 3, 2011No. Docket No. 9530-09UnpublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARRY S. FRIEDBERG AND CHARLOTTE MOSS, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Friedberg v. Comm'r
Docket No. 9530-09.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 2011-238; 2011 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 234; 102 T.C.M. (CCH) 356;
October 3, 2011, Filed
David J. Fischer and Kathleen Pakenham, for petitioners.
Marc Lee Caine, Rachel L. Schiffman, and Alex Shlivko, for respondent.
WELLS, Judge.
WELLS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WELLS, Judge: The instant case is before the Court on the parties' cross-motions for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 121.1 Respondent determined a deficiency of $1,321,250 and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Sundstrand Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Sundstrand Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
- Fred F. French Investing Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Bond v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carroll v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2016
- Graev v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2013
- Gorra v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2013
- Barry S. Friedberg & Charlotte Moss v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2013
- Friedberg v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.