Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Price v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 2001No. 2000-SC-0213-DGPublished

1ConcurrenceKeller, Justice

Although I concur in the result reached by the majority, I disagree with its conclusion that “Wolfe’s participation in the reenactment of the crime during the prosecutor’s closing argument, whether planned or unplanned, was highly improper.”1 In my opinion, the latitude we grant to attorneys in closing argument2 should allow demonstrations that illustrate evidence previously introduced at trial or reasonable inferences drawn from that evidence regardless of whether the prosecution’s complaining witness participates in the demonstration. While I recognize that closing argument demonstrations…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. KrollWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Bowling v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Smith v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. AshNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Stacy v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API