Legal Opinion
Fabry Glove and Mitten Co. v. Spitzer
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided November 7, 1995No. 95-C-376PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
CALLAHAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Background
This is a commercial case in which plaintiff Fabry Glove and Mitten Co., (“Fabry”) has sued A. Robert Spitzer, M.D., (“Spitzer”) and Grandoe Corporation (“Grandoe”). Jurisdiction of the Court is invoked pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1331 by virtue of the fact that there is diversity of citizenship and the amount in controversy exceeds $50,-' 000.
According to the allegations of the Complaint, which, at this stage of the proceedings, I must accept as true, McCroan v. Bailey, 543 F.Supp. 1201 (S.D.Ga.1982), Fa-bry…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- David Neiman D/B/A London Group (1974) v. Rudolf Wolff & Co., Ltd., James Gourlay and Ingleram Investments, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Daniel J. Hartwig Associates, Inc. v. Allan KannerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Wisconsin Electrical Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Pennant Products, Inc., and County of Monroe Industrial Development AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Zerbel v. H. L. Federman & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harley-Davidson Motor Co. v. Motor Sport, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1997