Bewley v. City of Lockport
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The written order, Exhibit 2, was intended as an order for an extra, but as such was not in compliance with the contract, as it was not approved by the city council. The plaintiff, therefore,- cannot recover upon the contract as for an- extra.- The city engineer was' not shown to have authority to order this work done. Therefore, the plaintiff cannot recover the value of the work done on the order of the city engineer and independent of the contract. There is an absence of proof of a breach of the contract by the city under the principle stated in Borough Const. Co. v. City of New York (200…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Borough Construction Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
3Cited by2 opinions
- General Valuations Co. v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Cupid Diaper Service Corp. v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1976