Legal Opinion

Baker v. Gundermann

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1966PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTheodore Velsor, J.

In this action to recover upon two written instruments, plaintiff moves for summary judgment pursuant to CPLB 3213 in lieu of a formal complaint.

Initially it is incumbent upon this court to determine whether the writings alluded to come within the purview of the statute (CPLB 3213), permitting the motion papers, in lieu of a com*640plaint, to accompany the summons when, in the words of the cited statute “ an action is based upon a * * * instrument for the payment of money only ”. (Emphasis supplied.)

The first of such subject instruments is in the form of a letter sworn to before a notary and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Channel Excavators, Inc. v. Amato Trucking Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Louis Sherry Ice Cream Co. v. KroggelNew York Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Maglich v. Saxe, Bacon & Bolan, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Istituto Per Lo Sviluppo Economico Dell' Italia Meridionale v. Sperti Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  3. All-O-Matic Manufacturing Corp. v. ShieldsNassau County District Court · 1969
  4. Orenstein v. OrensteinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1968
  5. Wagner v. CornblumNew York Supreme Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API