Legal Opinion

Rath v. Martin

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 25, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeals from Hardin District Court. — Hon. S. M. Weayer, Judge. Actions in .equity to quiet the title of the plaintiffs to lots in thie town-of Ackley. The actions were heard together on the same evidence. There was a decree in each against the defendants, and they appeal.—

1Opinion of the CourtBobinson, J.

The plaintiffs in the action first entitled are the executors of the will of J. Seaton Kelso, deceased, and his devisees and heirs. They claim to be the absolute owners, through the decedent, of lots numbered twenty-six, twenty-seven, twenty-eight, and twenty-nine, in block fifteen, in Burns and Foster’s addition to the town of Ackley. The plaintiff in the second action claims to be the absolute owner of lots numbered nineteen, twenty, twenty-one, twenty-two, twenty-three, twenty-four, and twenty-five in the same block. The defendants claim to' be the absolute owners of all the lots…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morris v. County of SiouxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. Harber v. Sexton & SonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  3. Iowa Railroad Land v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  4. Patton v. LutherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  5. Walton v. GraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1870

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wren v. BerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API