Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Phim

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 14, 2012PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenk, J.

The defendant appeals from his convictions of murder in the second degree and related firearms charges. The defendant was convicted on retrial; the jury at his first trial were unable to agree on a unanimous verdict. The defendant contends, among other things, that State and Federal double jeopardy protections precluded the judge at the second trial from instructing the jury on accessory liability where no such instruction was provided to the first jury. We conclude that the instruction given at the second trial was appropriate, because it would have been supported by the evidence introduced…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  5. Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. WardsworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
  3. Commonwealth v. MeasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. AkaraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API