Commonwealth v. Kittelberger
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge.
This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence 1 entered following appellant’s conviction for driving in excess of the speed limit. 2 The sole issue presented for our review is whether the Commonwealth sustained its burden of proving that the speed timing device utilized was of a type that had been approved by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDoT) where the only evidence offered by the Commonwealth relating to this matter was the certificate of accuracy. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the judgment of sentence and discharge appellant.
Before…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. GriscavageSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. HarperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. UngerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Commonwealth v. EinhornSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- In the Interest of D.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. AnsellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. KaufmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- State v. WestHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.