Legal Opinion
People v. Swontek
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 21, 2001No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw his guilty pleas or to vacate the judgments of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that Supreme Court erred in permitting the prosecutor to conduct the factual portion of the plea allocutions (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665; People v Smith, 288 AD2d 931; People v Sanchez, 284 AD2d 137). In any event, there is no merit to that contention. “[A]lthough a plea inquiry should normally be conducted by the court * * * the pleats were] clearly voluntary and there is no basis for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. SanchezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. MarvinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by6 opinions
- HICKS, QUENTIN J., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- MUNSON, KACIE, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. MunsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. MunsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. SwontekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.