Legal Opinion

State of Maine v. Shain Stanley

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 7, 2015No. Docket Han-13-587PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHjelm, J.

[¶ 1] Shain Stanley appeals from a judgment of conviction for violating 12 M.R.S. § 6575-G (2014) entered by the District Court (Ellsworth, Mallonee, J.) following a bench trial. Section 6575-G makes it a Class D crime to “fish for or take elvers within 150 feet of any part of a dam with a fishway or within 150 feet of a fishway.” (Emphasis added.) In a Unk form Summons and Complaint (USC), the State charged Stanley only with “fishing for elvers within 150 feet of a dam with a fishway,” but the court found Stanley guilty of fishing for elvers within 150 feet of a fishway, not a dam. On…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State of Maine v. Karl v. KittredgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  2. State v. GauthierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  3. State v. MurphySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  4. U.S. Bank, National Association, as Trustee for the MLMI Surf Trust Series 2006-BC2 v. Theodore W. ThomesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  5. State v. MartinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State of Maine v. Dale M. Pinkham Sr.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API