Legal Opinion

Friel v. Jones

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided October 19, 1964PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

206 A.2d 232 (1964)

Daniel D. FRIEL, Edwin A. Gee and J. Craig Yacoe, Plaintiffs,

v.

E. Russell JONES, Executor of the Estate of Alexia duPont Ortiz deBie, Defendant.

Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle.

October 19, 1964.

Daniel L. Herrmann, of Herrmann, Bayard, Brill & Russell, Wilmington, for plaintiffs.

Donald C. Taylor and H. Alfred Tarrant, Jr., of Cooch & Taylor, Wilmington, for defendant.

SHORT, Vice Chancellor:

This is an action for specific performance of an alleged contract of sale of a parcel of real estate. Defendant has moved for summary judgment. This is the decision on that motion.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Wolf v. Globe Liquor Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1954
  3. Jepsen v. MarohnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Foreman's Systems, Inc. v. Milk Dealers' Crate Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
  5. Agostini v. Colonial Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. PAMI-LEMB I Inc. v. EMB-NHC, L.L.C.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2004
  2. Grasso v. First USA BankSuperior Court of Delaware · 1998
  3. Friel v. JonesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  4. P & O Ports v. Continental StevedoringDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  5. Friel v. JonesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API