Legal Opinion

Wall v. Wall

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 11, 1914No. 5543PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Action for money had and received—appeal; from Fulton superior court—Judge Ellis. January 23, 1914.

1Opinion of the CourtBussell, C. J.

1. In the first assignment of error it is insisted that the trial judge erred in refusing to allow the defendant to open and conclude the argument. Upon a consideration of the record, we are of the opinion that this complaint is without merit. The plaintiff sought to recover $100, alleged to have been deposited by her with her father, to be repaid as she might demand it. • The defendant’s motion that he be awarded the opening and conclusion was made before the introduction of any evidence, and for that reason the merits of the motion could only be determined by the pleadings. As pointed out…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  2. Sledge v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  3. Albany Phosphate Co. v. Hugger Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Disbrow v. DurandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
  5. Crankshaw v. Schweizer Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McRae v. BrittonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  2. Edwards v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  3. Tatum v. MossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  4. Humphries v. Miller.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  5. Young v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API