Legal Opinion

Wiess v. Goodhue

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1904No. 1356PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the First District, in an appeal from Jefferson County. Wiess and others sued Goodhue and others for the recovery of land. Defendants had. judgment which was affirmed on appeal by plaintiffs,, who thereupon obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Associate Justice.

From the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals we make the following extract:

“V. Wiess, Percy H. Wiess and Ruth Wiess brought this suit August 31, 1900, in trespass to try title for the recovery of a small tract of land situated in the city of Beaumont,
“The defendants answered by plea of not guilty and sought to interpose the bar of limitation of three, five and ten years.
“Plaintiffs Ruth and Percy Wiess pleaded the disability of minority, in response to which defendants averred by supplemental answer that if' the two last named plaintiffs had any title to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McMurry v. StanleyTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Dulin v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Cleveland v. ClevelandTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Collins v. McCartyTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Hanks v. CrosbyTexas Supreme Court · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gilliam v. MahonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  2. Appel v. ChildressCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Belt v. CettiTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Estes v. EstesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  5. Hardy Oil Company v. BurnhamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API