Legal Opinion

Aimee D. v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided March 9, 2026No. 4:24-cv-01143Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION AIMEE D., § PLAINTIFF, § § V. § CASE NO. 4:24-CV-1143-Y-BK § COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY § ADMINISTRATION, § DEFENDANT. § FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Special Order 3, Plaintiff’s appeal of the denial of her application for Social Security disability benefits and supplemental security income, Doc. 1, is before the undersigned United States magistrate judge for findings and a recommended disposition. For the reasons…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Perez v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  5. Uwe Taylor v. Michael Astrue, CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API