Legal Opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Counsellors, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 3, 1975No. 404, Docket 74-2023PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of Judge Cooper of the District Court for the Southern District of New York, denying the application of a law firm, Con-boy, Hewitt, O’Brien & Boardman (Con-boy, Hewitt), for payment of $20,000 in legal fees for services rendered Capital Counsellors, Inc., a broker-dealer, and Capital Advisors, Inc., an investment adviser, both registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Con-boy, Hewitt also asked that its claim be granted a preference out of the assets of the two corporations as an administration expense.

The services…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Randolph v. ScruggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Barnes v. . NewcombNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. In Re Evenod Perfumer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  4. Culhane v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  5. People v. Commercial Alliance Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,999 Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Counsellors, Inc., Conboy, Hewitt, O'Brien & Boardman v. Sydney B. Wertheimer, Receiver-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API