Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Counsellors, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from an order of Judge Cooper of the District Court for the Southern District of New York, denying the application of a law firm, Con-boy, Hewitt, O’Brien & Boardman (Con-boy, Hewitt), for payment of $20,000 in legal fees for services rendered Capital Counsellors, Inc., a broker-dealer, and Capital Advisors, Inc., an investment adviser, both registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Con-boy, Hewitt also asked that its claim be granted a preference out of the assets of the two corporations as an administration expense.
The services…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Randolph v. ScruggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Barnes v. . NewcombNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- In Re Evenod Perfumer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Culhane v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- People v. Commercial Alliance Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,999 Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Counsellors, Inc., Conboy, Hewitt, O'Brien & Boardman v. Sydney B. Wertheimer, Receiver-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975