Legal Opinion

In Re Natasha S.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 20, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSilver, J.

[¶ 1] The adoptive mother of Natasha S. appeals from a judgment entered by the District Court (Fort Kent, Daigle, J.) terminating her parental rights pursuant to 22 M.R.S. § 4055 (2007). The adoptive mother contends that the court erred in admitting the Interstate Compact on Placement of Children (ICPC) home study for purposes other than showing compliance with the ICPC. We agree that the court erred in admitting the ICPC study for purposes beyond those permitted by statute, and we therefore must vacate the court’s judgment and remand for further proceedings.1

I. BACKGROUND

[¶2] Janice S. is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Scott S.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  2. In Re Elijah R.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  3. State v. MoultonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  4. In Re Michelle W.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  5. In Re Rachel J.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re A.M.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  2. Matthew W. Pitts v. Amanda M. MooreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  3. In Re Soriah B.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  4. In Re Natasha S.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API