Legal Opinion

Mullins v. Finch

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided November 19, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 69-C-118-APublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WIDENER, District Judge.

This is an action brought by claimant, Ralph Mullins, under § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking a review of the decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Wei-*590fare denying claimant’s application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits claimed under §§ 216(i) of the Act, 42 U.S.C., 416(i), and 223(d) of the Act as amended, 42 U.S.C. 423(d) (Cum.Supp.1969) respectively.

Section 205(g) of the Act sets out the scope of the court’s review providing that “The finding of the Secretary as to any fact, if supported…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Charles M. Laws v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  2. Clistie Bell Thomas v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of the Department of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  3. May L. Hayes v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  4. Continental Can Company, Inc. v. United States of America and Federal Maritime BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  5. Griffey v. CohenDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rhode Island Consumers' Council v. SmithSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
  2. Billings v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API