Legal Opinion

Ex Parte: Joseph Rodriguez v. the State of Texas

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)

Decided April 22, 2024No. 08-23-00154-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § No. 08-23-00154-CR EX PARTE § Appeal from the JOSEPH RODRIGUEZ, § 210th Judicial District Court Appellant. § of El Paso County, Texas § (TC# 20220D00564) MEMORANDUM OPINION Joseph Rodriguez appeals the trial court’s order denying his application for writ of habeas corpus.1 Rodriguez asserted that Texas statutes, which define age 17 as an age affecting criminal responsibility, are unconstitutional on their face and as applied to him under the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. See

Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 51.02(2);

Tex. Penal Code…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Ex Parte WheelerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API