Legal Opinion

Pleasant v. McDaniel

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 18, 2018No. CV–17–405PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBart F. Virden, Judge

Roger D. Pleasant appeals the decision of the Pulaski County Circuit Court denying his motion to dismiss and denying his request to submit non-AMI verdict forms to the jury. We affirm.

On June 23, 2014, the State filed a complaint against Roger D. Pleasant; Information and Discovery, Inc.; PSG and Investigation, LLC; Accident Claim Service, LLC; Physician 1st Marketing Group, LLC; Network Collision Group, LLC; Rogerick Pleasant; James Hinton; and Brian Hinton.1 In its complaint, the State alleged that the defendants violated the Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (ADTPA), *10specifically,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Air Evac EMS, Inc. v. USAble Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
  2. Victory v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Restasis (Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion) Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
  2. Pleasant v. State ex rel. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
  3. Adams v. TDC General Contractors LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API