Legal Opinion
I-T-E Imperial Corp. v. Bankers Trust Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 9, 1980PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Before us appellant argues that the legislative history of article 3-A of the Lien Law requires a reversal because the extensive quotation at page 547 of the 1958 Report of the Law Revision Commission from Gramatan-Sullivan, Inc. v Koslow (143 F Supp 641, affd 240 F2d 523, cert den 353 US 958) shows an intent to incorporate in the definition of “purchaser in good faith for value” as those words are used in subdivision 1 of section 72 of the Lien Law, the limitation that notice of facts sufficient…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Chemical Bank v. HaskellNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Gramatan-Sullivan, Inc. v. KoslowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
3Cited by11 opinions
- LeChase Data/Telecom Services v. GoebertNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Bank of Babylon v. Zaffuto Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Ben Soep Co. v. Highgate Hall of Orange County, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1988
- Gerrity Co. v. Bonacquisti Construction Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1987
- LeChase Data/Telecom Services, LLC v. GoebertNew York Supreme Court · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.