State ex rel. Murphy v. Bernier
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Writ of quo warranto issued from the supreme court upon an information which contained the following allegations: That said relators, K. M. Murphy and David H. Hayes, have been since prior to the tenth day of March, 1887, trustees of the village of Mendota, in the county of Dakota, in said state, which village is duly organized and incorporated under the general laws of said state therefor provided; and that said relators did duly qualify and act as such trustees, and still…
Read the full summary
Writ of quo warranto issued from the supreme court upon an information which contained the following allegations: That said relators, K. M. Murphy and David H. Hayes, have been since prior to the tenth day of March, 1887, trustees of the village of Mendota, in the county of Dakota, in said state, which village is duly organized and incorporated under the general laws of said state therefor provided; and that said relators did duly qualify and act as such trustees, and still are such trustees, and members of said village council, and entitled to said offices, and to perform therein the duties…
1Per curiam
Now, after due consideration, it is ordered that said writ be, and hereby is, quashed and discharged, and that the respondents have judgment accordingly.
2Cited by8 opinions
- Elwell v. ComstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Murphy v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Weisgerber v. Nez Perce CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
- Griffith v. County Court of Merger CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
- People ex rel. Hartwick v. AveryMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.