Legal Opinion

Vidovic v. Losinjska Plovidba Oour Broadarstvo

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 15, 1994No. Civ. A. No. 93-3887Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

PADOVA, District Judge.

In this ease, a foreign seaman injured in the course of his employment aboard a vessel sued the foreign owners of that vessel for penalty wages, maintenance and cure, and damages arising from his personal injuries. The shipowners have now moved to dismiss under the doctrine of forum non conveniens. For the following reasons, I will deny the motion.

The following facts are essentially undisputed. The various independent republics that formerly comprised the nation of Yugoslavia are in the midst of a civil war. Defendant Losinjska Plovidba Oour Broadarstvo…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Lacey v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  4. Lacey v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  5. Vidovic v. Losinjska Plovidba Oour BroadarstvoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API