Legal Opinion

Yinger v. Springer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 23, 1973No. Appeal, 9PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice O’Brien,

On April 23, 1971, appellant filed a complaint in equity against Jacob Springer to enforce specifically a conveyance of real estate. Appellant’s cause of action for specific performance was based on a written sales agreement dated July 19, 1968. The agreement of sale described the property in question as “the property known as R I) New Cumberland Jacob Springer’s 80 acres more or less wich (sic) will exclude 7 acres of the 87 acres more or less.” The agreement of sale was signed by appellant and an agent of Springer who was authorized to sell Springer’s property.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Suchan Et Ux. v. SwopeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Prager v. McAdamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Prager v. McAdam, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Butler County1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Snow v. Corsica Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Ross v. Shawmut Development Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Merwarth v. TownsendSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API