Legal Opinion
Siebert v. Tavarez, 88310 (5-31-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 31, 2007No. 88310PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant Amanda Siebert appeals from a court order adopting a magistrate's decision to modify the amount of child support she receives from defendant-appellee Julian Tavarez. Siebert complains that the court erred by (1) denying her motion for leave to file supplemental objections, (2) adopting a magistrate's decision which failed to consider the provisions of R.C. 3119.23(L), and (3) adopting a magistrate's decision which failed to consider the deviation factors set forth in R.C. 3119.23. We find that the court did not err by denying Siebert's…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gomez v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Johnson v. NormanOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. FolkOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Jarvis v. Witter, Unpublished Decision (12-9-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
3Cited by3 opinions
- Freeman v. Freeman, Unpublished Decision (12-3-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Abbey v. PeavyOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Lanham v. MierzwiakOhio Court of Appeals · 2011