Parkmerced Co. v. City and Cty. of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, J.
In the action of Parkmerced Company, a partnership, against the City and County of San Francisco (the City), for a refund of real property taxes paid under protest, the superior court entered judgment against the City for “the principal sum of $30,400.00, interest of $5,142.67, or a total sum of $35,542.67.” The City has appealed.
We find no merit in the appeal, and for the reasons we now state the judgment will be affirmed.
The appeal concerns the application to its factual context of the so-called “Proposition 13—Jarvis-Gann Amendment,” added to the state’s Constitution as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Solomon v. WaltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fourth Investment Lp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- E. Gottschalk & Co. v. County of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Munkdale v. GianniniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Larson v. DucaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Fashion Valley Mall, LLC v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.