Legal Opinion

The BANK OF NORTH-AMERICA v. Pettit

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 1, 1793PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

4 U.S. 127 (____)

4 Dall. 127

The Bank of North-America

versus

Pettit.

Supreme Court of United States.

It was argued by Tilghman and Lewis, for the plaintiff.

By the COURT:

The defence is want of notice of the protest of the note in question, within a reasonable time. The law in England is very strict upon this subject. Before any statute existed there, to render promissory notes negotiable, such notes were often made; but they were only regarded as evidence of a debt, and could not, as instruments, be declared upon in an action at law, till the provision was made in the statutes of W. 3. and Anne.…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
  2. ROBERTSON v. VogleSupreme Court of the United States · 1788
  3. Gurly v. Gettysburg BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1821
  4. Cashman Dredging and Marine Contracting Co., LLC v. BelesimoDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024
  5. Stothart Co. v. LewisTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity · 1807

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API