The BANK OF NORTH-AMERICA v. Pettit
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
4 U.S. 127 (____)
4 Dall. 127
The Bank of North-America
versus
Pettit.
Supreme Court of United States.
It was argued by Tilghman and Lewis, for the plaintiff.
By the COURT:
The defence is want of notice of the protest of the note in question, within a reasonable time. The law in England is very strict upon this subject. Before any statute existed there, to render promissory notes negotiable, such notes were often made; but they were only regarded as evidence of a debt, and could not, as instruments, be declared upon in an action at law, till the provision was made in the statutes of W. 3. and Anne.…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Thomas v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
- ROBERTSON v. VogleSupreme Court of the United States · 1788
- Gurly v. Gettysburg BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1821
- Cashman Dredging and Marine Contracting Co., LLC v. BelesimoDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024
- Stothart Co. v. LewisTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity · 1807