Legal Opinion

R.V. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 12, 1986No. Nos. 85-904, 85-2029PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERGUSON, Judge.

We agree with the trial court’s factual determination that a nunchaku (“num-chucks”), a potentially .lethal device which originated from the martial arts, is a deadly weapon. Unlike other common objects which may be deadly only because of their use or threatened use, the sole modern use of a nunchaku is to cause great bodily harm.1 Appellants, who carried the nun-chaku on their persons in a concealed manner, were properly adjudicated delinquent for carrying a concealed weapon. See *913C.J.R. v. State, 429 So.2d 753 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 440 So.2d 351 (Fla.1983).

Affirmed..…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In the Interest of C.J.R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. Thompson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. R.R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. Maloney v. SingasDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  5. C.A.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API