Legal Opinion
State v. Casey
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 24, 2002No. 3D02-04PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
821 So.2d 1187 (2002)
The STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Sean CASEY, Appellee.
No. 3D02-04.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 24, 2002.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and John D. Barker, Assistant State Attorney, for appellant.
Hirsch & Markus, and Milton Hirsch, Miami, for appellee.
Before GERSTEN, SHEVIN, and SORONDO, JJ.
2Per curiam
We reverse the order granting the defendant's motion to suppress. A trial court is required to accept evidence which has not been impeached, discredited, controverted, contradictory within itself or physically impossible. See State v. Moreno, 558…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. FernandezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- State v. G.H.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- State v. MorenoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
4Cited by6 opinions
- State v. OjedaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- State v. WongDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- State v. JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- J.Q. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- JQ v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.