Legal Opinion

United States v. Robles-Vertiz

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 7, 2006No. 04-50585PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WIENER, Circuit Judge:

This matter is before us on remand from the Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of United States v. Booker. 1 At our request, the parties have commented on the impact of Booker. We conclude that Booker does not affect the sentence received by Defendanb-Appellant Jose Luis Robles-Vertiz.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Robles-Vertiz pleaded guilty to and was convicted of being in the United States illegally after removal, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Standing alone, a § 1326(a) offense carries a maximum penalty of two years’ imprisonment and one year of supervised…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. United States v. MaresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Rodriguez-SantosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API