Legal Opinion
Stanton v. Eastman
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1909PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Motiokt to compel purchaser on partition sale to complete purchase.
1Opinion of the CourtPound, J.
This is an action in partition. The purchaser at the referee’s sale under the interlocutory judgment objects to the title tendered, on the ground that it is not marketable. Plaintiff obtained ah order for service of the summons upon non-resident defendants, on an affidavit which reads as follows:
“ Emma L. Stanton, being duly sworn, says she is the plaintiff in the above entitled action; that the defendant Josephine D. Bobst resides at the City of Toledo, State of Ohio, and that the defendants Walter Lyon, Jessie Lyon and Bertie Lyon reside at San Francisco, California.
“ That deponent knows…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carleton v. . CarletonNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Kennedy v. New York Life Insurance & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Kennedy v. . LambNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Sunswick Land Co. v. MurdockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carman v. BedellNew York Supreme Court · 1913