Moultrie v. Dixon
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Wallace, J., Berkeley, February, 1886. The proceedings in this case were founded upon the following affidavit: Personally appeared before me, E. T. Legare, atrial justice in and for the County of Berkeley, Sylvie Moultrie, who, being duly sworn, says that one Stanley Dixon was at some time past holding certain premises of one Parish Anderson at a monthly rent, which was due and payable the 8th day of each month, and that he has failed to pay said monthly rent when…
Read the full summary
Before Wallace, J., Berkeley, February, 1886. The proceedings in this case were founded upon the following affidavit: Personally appeared before me, E. T. Legare, atrial justice in and for the County of Berkeley, Sylvie Moultrie, who, being duly sworn, says that one Stanley Dixon was at some time past holding certain premises of one Parish Anderson at a monthly rent, which was due and payable the 8th day of each month, and that he has failed to pay said monthly rent when same was due, and that he was notified on August the 20th that such contract of rent would cease, and possession having…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mr. Chiee Justice Simpson.
The respondent, Stanley Dixon, was summoned before E. T. Legare, a trial justice for Berkeley County, charged on oath of the appellant with being-in possession of certain lands and tenements of one Parish Anderson without warrant or authority of law, and required to show cause before the trial justice on the 9th day of November, A. D. 1885, why he should not be ejected from the premises. The summons was dated on November 2,1885, and served on November 5. Dixon appeared on November^, and upon oath that the trial justice was a…
2Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Solomons' EstateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906