Meredith v. Honeywell International, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
(Granting Defendant’s Rule 12(b)(l)Motion to Dismiss)
HUDSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Honeywell International, Inc.’s (“Honeywell”) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Procedure. Both parties have filed memoran-da of law in support of their respective positions. The Court will dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court, and argument would not aid in the decisional process. Finding that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Burroughs v. Walmont, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1969
- Floyd v. MitchellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
- Smith v. HornSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
- Intermodal Services, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.