Bauer v. Monroe
Montana Supreme Court
1DissentJustice Angstman
(dissenting) :
The majority opinion seems to rest upon the proposition that the trial court erred in not finding that the oral agreement relied upon by plaintiff constituted a modification of the written contract and that it was not sufficiently performed by the parties to meet the requirements of Sec. 7569, Revised Codes. I think it is fallacious to say that the oral agreement constituted but a modification of the written contract. According to the evidence offered by and in behalf of plaintiff the written con tract was completely abandoned and a new agreement made which superseded and took…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bishop v. BusseIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- American Food Co. v. HalsteadIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Sanders v. LucasMontana Supreme Court · 1941
- Moses v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Dodd Lumber & Timber Co. v. Krusen Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.